Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Qwen2.5-Max
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 39.3 to 34.8.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2.5-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.4 | 40.1 |
| Released | — | 2025-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 41.6 (#109), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.2 (#118)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1433 | 1359 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 27.9 (#94), Qwen2.5-Max: 24.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1360 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 132.54 |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 36.4 (#116), Qwen2.5-Max: 34.3 (#162)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1369 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.3 (#122), Qwen2.5-Max: 34.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1432 | 1337 |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 52.1 (#91), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | 1382 |
| LMArena French | 1449 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1396 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1299 |
| LMArena Korean | 1387 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1444 | 1377 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.4 (#118), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.5 (#147)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#116), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.3 (#137)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1395 | 1358 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 59.0 (#109), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1349 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Qwen2.5-Max?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (41.6 vs 41.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Qwen2.5-Max share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.