Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Qwen1.5-14B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 58.8 to 33.6.
- Qwen1.5-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 32.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.3 (#107), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1433 | 1138 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 29.1 (#95), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1113 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.1 (#114), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1125 |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.9 (#127), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1431 | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 51.9 (#98), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | 1147 |
| LMArena French | 1449 | 1116 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | 1394 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1444 | 1085 |
| LMArena Korean | 1384 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.2 (#122), Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1102 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#121), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1395 | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 58.8 (#114), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1349 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Qwen1.5-14B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.