Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 51.9 to 38.1.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Think
ProviderAmazonAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.037.9
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1715

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.3 (#107), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Coding14331291

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 29.1 (#95), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts14221272

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.1 (#114), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Math14311305

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.9 (#127), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Expert14311295

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 51.9 (#98), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Non-English14051209
LMArena Chinese14631242
LMArena French14491260
LMArena German13951262
LMArena Russian13941193
LMArena Spanish14441289
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1384—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.2 (#122), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following13871247

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#121), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query13951272

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 58.8 (#114), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Text14151272
LMArena Creative Writing13491226
LMArena Multi-Turn13801252

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper