Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 51.9 to 42.6.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderAmazonAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.039.4
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1716

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.3 (#107), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14331347

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 29.1 (#95), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14221322

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.1 (#114), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14311305

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.9 (#127), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert14311308

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 51.9 (#98), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14051275
LMArena Chinese14631304
LMArena French14491328
LMArena German13951282
LMArena Korean13841206
LMArena Russian13941268
LMArena Spanish14441336
LMArena Japanese1383—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.2 (#122), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13871299

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#121), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13951312

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 58.8 (#114), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14151311
LMArena Creative Writing13491264
LMArena Multi-Turn13801309

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper