Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 Amazon

43.0

Rank #101 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

40.2

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 29.1 to 17.3.
  • Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mistral Medium 3.5
ProviderAmazonMistral AI
Noometry Index43.040.2
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—210K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1722

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.3 (#107), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Coding14331461
LMArena WebDev—1264

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 29.1 (#95), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14221436
Kagi LLM Benchmark—41.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—12.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.35

Math Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.1 (#114), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Math14311431

Knowledge Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.9 (#127), Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Expert14311432

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1223

Multilingual Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 51.9 (#98), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English14051404
LMArena Chinese14631442
LMArena French14491448
LMArena German13951451
LMArena Korean13841385
LMArena Russian13941395
LMArena Spanish14441409
LMArena Japanese1383—

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.2 (#122), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Instruction Following13871415

Long Context Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#121), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Longer Query13951415

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 58.8 (#114), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text14151421
LMArena Creative Writing13491374
LMArena Multi-Turn13801423
EQ-Bench 4—993

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper