Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 42.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

46.6

Rank #56 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 4.7 in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 41.6.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Grok 4.7 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Grok 4.7
ProviderAmazonxAI
Noometry Index42.446.6
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 41.6 (#109), Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Grok 4.7
LMArena Coding14331423
CursorBench—46.3%
LMArena WebDev—1636
FrontierSWE—29.5%
SciCode—57.4%

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 27.9 (#94), Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Grok 4.7
LMArena Hard Prompts14221409
NYT Connections (extended)—76.8%
CritPt—17.7%

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 36.4 (#116), Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Grok 4.7
LMArena Math14311393
ProofBench—34%

Knowledge Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.3 (#122), Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Grok 4.7
LMArena Expert14321413

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: —, Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Grok 4.7
Furniture Assembly—20.8%

Multilingual Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 52.1 (#91), Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Grok 4.7
LMArena Non-English14051392
LMArena Chinese14631476
LMArena Russian13951396
LMArena French1449—
LMArena German1396—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1387—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.4 (#118), Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Grok 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following13871406

Long Context Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#116), Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Grok 4.7
LMArena Longer Query13951416

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 59.0 (#109), Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Grok 4.7
LMArena Text14151397
LMArena Creative Writing13491391
LMArena Multi-Turn13801389
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2007

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 42.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 41.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Grok 4.7 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper