Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has enough public results to be ranked (#101); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

42.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 41.6.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and GPT-6.1 Sol specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GPT-6.1 Sol
ProviderAmazonOpenAI
Noometry Index42.442.1
Released—2026-09-29
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked172

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 41.6 (#109), GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GPT-6.1 Sol
DeepSWE—75.2%
LMArena Coding1433—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GPT-6.1 Sol
GDP.pdf—32%

Reasoning Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 27.9 (#94), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Hard Prompts1422—

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 36.4 (#116), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Math1431—

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.3 (#122), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Expert1432—

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 52.1 (#91), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Non-English1405—
LMArena Chinese1463—
LMArena French1449—
LMArena German1396—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1387—
LMArena Russian1395—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.4 (#118), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Instruction Following1387—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#116), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Longer Query1395—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 59.0 (#109), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text1415—
LMArena Creative Writing1349—
LMArena Multi-Turn1380—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than GPT-6.1 Sol?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has enough public results to be ranked (#101); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 41.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and GPT-6.1 Sol share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6.1 Sol has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper