Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs GLM-5.1

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.8

Rank #59 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.1 leads 54.9 to 39.9.
  • GLM-5.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and GLM-5.1 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-5.1
ProviderAmazonZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index43.047.8
Released—2026-04-07
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked1741

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.3 (#107), GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-5.1
LMArena Coding14331485
SWE-bench Verified—74.2%
LMArena WebDev—1508
SciCode—43.8%
WeirdML—57.1%
ALE-Bench—887.1

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: —, GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-5.1
APEX-Agents—40.9%
ExploitBench—18.1%
GBAEval—0%
Vending-Bench 2—5,634

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 29.1 (#95), GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-5.1
LMArena Hard Prompts14221472
SimpleBench—55.1%
NYT Connections (extended)—77.7%
CritPt—4.6%
Chess Puzzles—19%
Thematic Generalization—69.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.84

Math GLM-5.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.1 (#114), GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-5.1
LMArena Math14311473
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—36.8%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—67.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
ProofBench—22.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—33.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—12.5%

Knowledge GLM-5.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.9 (#127), GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-5.1
LMArena Expert14311476
GPQA Diamond—89.9%
SimpleQA Verified—34%

Multilingual GLM-5.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 51.9 (#98), GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-5.1
LMArena Non-English14051447
LMArena Chinese14631515
LMArena French14491474
LMArena German13951465
LMArena Japanese13831434
LMArena Korean13841418
LMArena Russian13941454
LMArena Spanish14441469

Instruction Following GLM-5.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.2 (#122), GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-5.1
LMArena Instruction Following13871451

Long Context GLM-5.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#121), GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-5.1
LMArena Longer Query13951466

Writing & Preference GLM-5.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 58.8 (#114), GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-5.1
LMArena Text14151461
LMArena Creative Writing13491453
LMArena Multi-Turn13801472
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1592

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or GLM-5.1 better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 42.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and GLM-5.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.1 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper