Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 59.0 to 46.1.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 42.4 | 39.1 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.58 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.68 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 41.6 (#109), DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 46.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1433 | — |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 27.9 (#94), DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 52.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | — |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 36.4 (#116), DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.3 (#122), DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1432 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 52.1 (#91), DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | — |
| LMArena French | 1449 | — |
| LMArena German | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1444 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.4 (#118), DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#116), DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1395 | — |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 59.0 (#109), DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1349 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1276 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3.