Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Qwen2.5-Max

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2.5-Max Alibaba (Qwen)

40.7

Rank #146 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 38.5 to 35.3.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen2.5-Max specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen2.5-Max
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.140.7
Released—2025-01-25
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1727

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Coding14121359
LiveBench Coding—64.4%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Hard Prompts13961360
LiveBench Reasoning—51.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis—67.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—132.53
LiveBench—62.3%

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Math14251369
LiveBench Math—58.4%

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Expert13861337
Confabulations—21.8%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Non-English13721352
LMArena Chinese14041382
LMArena French14251396
LMArena German13911350
LMArena Japanese13601300
LMArena Korean13241304
LMArena Russian13711353
LMArena Spanish13821377

Instruction Following Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Instruction Following13651335
LiveBench Instruction Following—75.3%

Long Context Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Longer Query13701358

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Text13941367
LMArena Creative Writing13181339
LMArena Multi-Turn13641364
Short-Story Creative Writing—72.9%
LiveBench Language—56.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.6 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen2.5-Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper