Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Phi-4 Mini
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 41.6 to 28.1.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 30.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1412 | — |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | — |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | — |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | — |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1382 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Phi-4 Mini?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.