Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 38.5.
  • Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
ProviderAmazonMoonshot AI
Noometry Index42.145.8
Released—2025-11-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Coding14121454
LMArena WebDev—1322

Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Hard Prompts13961428
Chess Puzzles—20%

Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Math14251429
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—83.1%

Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Expert13861439
GPQA Diamond—84.2%

Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Non-English13721398
LMArena Chinese14041456
LMArena French14251425
LMArena German13911390
LMArena Japanese13601357
LMArena Korean13241330
LMArena Russian13711391
LMArena Spanish13821406

Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Instruction Following13651403

Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Longer Query13701415

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Text13941415
LMArena Creative Writing13181374
LMArena Multi-Turn13641414

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper