Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs GPT-5.4 mini
GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 mini in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 51.4 to 37.8.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-5.4 mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 44.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.75 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.50 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 46 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 mini leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.0 (#123), GPT-5.4 mini: 45.0 (#67)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1413 | 1438 |
| FrontierCode | — | 27% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1397 |
| SciCode | — | 49.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 60.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 29.6 (#74)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 36.3% |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 27.3 (#110), GPT-5.4 mini: 30.3 (#77)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1424 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 18.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 61.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 63.7% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 61.7% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 11% |
| DTBench | — | 80% |
| LMCA | — | 40.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 148.83 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57 |
Math GPT-5.4 mini leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 36.2 (#121), GPT-5.4 mini: 45.4 (#63)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | 1418 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 51.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 9.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 28.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 mini leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 37.8 (#142), GPT-5.4 mini: 51.4 (#62)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1385 | 1434 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 86.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 29.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.5% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 39.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1245 |
Multilingual GPT-5.4 mini leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.7 (#127), GPT-5.4 mini: 52.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1405 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1426 | 1440 |
| LMArena German | 1391 | 1407 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1355 | 1375 |
| LMArena Korean | 1327 | 1369 |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | 1417 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1381 | 1403 |
Instruction Following GPT-5.4 mini leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.3 (#136), GPT-5.4 mini: 74.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | 1405 |
Long Context GPT-5.4 mini leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#128), GPT-5.4 mini: 42.9 (#107)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | 1407 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.9 (#131), GPT-5.4 mini: 64.2 (#56)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | 1370 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1429 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1665 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than GPT-5.4 mini?
GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or GPT-5.4 mini better for coding?
GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.0 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and GPT-5.4 mini share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 mini has 46.