Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs GLM-4.7
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and GLM-4.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 1 category and GLM-4.7 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7 leads 47.0 to 37.8.
- GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GLM-4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 41.7 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.0 (#123), GLM-4.7: 43.6 (#74)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1413 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1435 |
| SciCode | — | 45.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 399.48 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, GLM-4.7: 26.4 (#96)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 33.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,377 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 27.3 (#110), GLM-4.7: 23.7 (#161)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1443 |
| SimpleBench | — | 47.7% |
| CritPt | — | 1.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.53 |
Math GLM-4.7 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 36.2 (#121), GLM-4.7: 37.7 (#92)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | 1423 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 2.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge GLM-4.7 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 37.8 (#142), GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#74)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1385 | 1424 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 32.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.7% |
Multilingual GLM-4.7 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.7 (#127), GLM-4.7: 53.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1405 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1426 | 1432 |
| LMArena German | 1391 | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1355 | 1439 |
| LMArena Korean | 1327 | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | 1423 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1381 | 1433 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.7 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.3 (#136), GLM-4.7: 74.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | 1411 |
Long Context GLM-4.7 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#128), GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#111)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | 1432 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.9% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 10.9% |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.7 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.9 (#131), GLM-4.7: 61.1 (#89)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1413 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than GLM-4.7?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and GLM-4.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or GLM-4.7 better for coding?
GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and GLM-4.7 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7 has 36.