Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

50.3

Rank #40 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 46.2 to 27.3.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ProviderAmazonDeepSeek
Noometry Index41.550.3
Released—2026-09-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—393K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.60
Results tracked1725

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.0 (#123), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Coding14131511
LMArena WebDev—1620
SciCode—51.9%
ALE-Bench—1,092

Reasoning DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 27.3 (#110), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts13961485
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
CritPt—14.3%
DTBench—89.9%
LMCA—47%
Surface Evolver Bench—46.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.01

Math DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 36.2 (#121), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Math14251493
ProofBench—54%

Knowledge DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 37.8 (#142), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Expert13851505

Multilingual DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.7 (#127), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Non-English13721452
LMArena Chinese14051506
LMArena French14261448
LMArena Russian13711473
LMArena Spanish13811499
LMArena German1391—
LMArena Japanese1355—
LMArena Korean1327—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.3 (#136), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13651475

Long Context DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#128), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Longer Query13701476

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.9 (#131), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text13941465
LMArena Creative Writing13181436
LMArena Multi-Turn13641460
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1540

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper