Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus DeepSeek

43.1

Rank #97 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 2 categories and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads 61.0 to 56.6.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
ProviderAmazonDeepSeek
Noometry Index42.143.1
Released—2025-09-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—164K
Max output—147K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.27
Output $ / M tokens—$1
Results tracked1716

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 42.0 (#113)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Coding14121426
SciCode—40.6%
ALE-Bench—745.17

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 26.4 (#133)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Hard Prompts13961426
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.4%
CritPt—1.7%
DTBench—81.3%
LMCA—28.6%

Math Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 38.5 (#137)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Math14251402

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Expert1386—

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.1 (#92)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Non-English13721407
LMArena Russian13711436
LMArena Chinese1404—
LMArena French1425—
LMArena German1391—
LMArena Japanese1360—
LMArena Korean1324—
LMArena Spanish1382—

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.0 (#106)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Instruction Following13651404

Long Context DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.4 (#97)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Longer Query13701421

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.0 (#92)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Text13941419
LMArena Creative Writing13181403
LMArena Multi-Turn13641411

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.6 vs 42.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper