Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs DeepSeek-V3
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 5 categories and DeepSeek-V3 in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 28.4 to 20.5.
- DeepSeek-V3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek-V3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 39.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-26 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 164K |
| Max output | — | 164K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.24 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.90 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 60 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), DeepSeek-V3: 42.3 (#106)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek-V3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1412 | 1368 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 55.1% |
| SciCode | — | 35.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 36.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 50% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 70.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 62.2% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 86.6% |
| MBPP+ | — | 73% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, DeepSeek-V3: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek-V3 |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | — | 49.6% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), DeepSeek-V3: 20.5 (#236)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek-V3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1365 |
| SimpleBench | — | 27.2% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 52.3% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 65.8% |
| DTBench | — | 64.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 60.9% |
| LMCA | — | 15.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 87.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.94 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.1 |
| HellaSwag | — | 88.9% |
| LiveBench | — | 66.9% |
| PIQA | — | 84.7% |
| WinoGrande | — | 85.2% |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), DeepSeek-V3: 32.1 (#219)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek-V3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | 1373 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 37.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 40.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 73.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 75.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), DeepSeek-V3: 37.5 (#155)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek-V3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1351 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 67.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 26.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 53.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 95.3% |
| MMLU | — | 87.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 82.9% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), DeepSeek-V3: 48.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek-V3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1391 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1385 |
| LMArena German | 1391 | 1374 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1360 | 1333 |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1382 | 1358 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), DeepSeek-V3: 72.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek-V3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | 1345 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
| IFEval | — | 83.2% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), DeepSeek-V3: 34.0 (#253)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek-V3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | 1352 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 50% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), DeepSeek-V3: 57.4 (#130)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek-V3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | 1375 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | 1364 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1389 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 77% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1472 |
| WildBench | — | 83% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 49.1% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than DeepSeek-V3?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or DeepSeek-V3 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (41.6 vs 42.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and DeepSeek-V3 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-V3 has 60.