Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Claude 3 Opus
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 8 categories and Claude 3 Opus in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 39.0 to 14.8.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Claude 3 Opus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 29.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 46 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1412 | 1264 |
| WeirdML | — | 19.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 38.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 57.4% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 77.4% |
| MBPP+ | — | 73.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.5% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1245 |
| SimpleBench | — | 23.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 40.6% |
| DTBench | — | 61.6% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| LMCA | — | 17% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 126.91 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.4 |
| LiveBench | — | 49.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 88.5% |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | 1273 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.7% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 43.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 37.5% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1223 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.2% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 12.6% |
| Confabulations | — | 22.7% |
| MMLU | — | 84.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1023 |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1258 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1248 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1275 |
| LMArena German | 1391 | 1258 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1360 | 1204 |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | 1187 |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | 1280 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1382 | 1246 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | 1248 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 63.9% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | 1259 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | 1262 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | 1235 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 50.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Claude 3 Opus?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Claude 3 Opus better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Claude 3 Opus share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Claude 3 Opus has 46.