Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 49.2 to 27.3.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3.7 Max
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.951.5
Released—2026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked933

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding13701498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts13561483
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.68

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%
LMArena Math—1490

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
LMArena Expert—1488

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English13401474
LMArena Chinese13411530
LMArena Russian—1484

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following13151460

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query13331482

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text13641476
LMArena Creative Writing13071449
LMArena Multi-Turn13551481
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper