Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 62.4 to 55.0.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.6 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 47.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1371 | 1467 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122), Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1449 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.67 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1456 |
Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1341 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1345 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1454 |
| LMArena German | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1316 | 1425 |
Long Context Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146), Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1440 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1365 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1405 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1438 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen3.6 Plus?
Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?
Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 39.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen3.6 Plus share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.