Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.9 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 32.8 to 27.3.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 42.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.78 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | — |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.9 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.