Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen3 32B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3 32B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #166 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3 32B in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 26.2 to 19.6.
  • Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen3 32B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 32B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.438.8
Released—2025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked926

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142), Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 32B
LMArena Coding13711358
Aider Polyglot—40%
SciCode—35.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 32B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—48.7%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122), Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 32B
LMArena Hard Prompts13561335
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—5%
DTBench—67.5%
LMCA—17.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.51

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 32B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—66.9%
LMArena Math—1399

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 32B
GPQA Diamond—65.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.9%
LMArena Expert—1362

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145), Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 32B
LMArena Non-English13411317
LMArena Chinese13451357
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Russian—1311

Instruction Following Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167), Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 32B
LMArena Instruction Following13161305

Long Context Qwen3 32B leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146), Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 32B
LMArena Longer Query13341327
Fiction.LiveBench—74.2%

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144), Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 32B
LMArena Text13651340
LMArena Creative Writing13071297
LMArena Multi-Turn13541331

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen3 32B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.6 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen3 32B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper