Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen1.5-7B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 55.0 to 29.8.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 30.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1371 | 1107 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122), Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1066 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1080 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1341 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1345 | 1140 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1006 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1316 | 1058 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1365 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1061 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.6 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen1.5-7B share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.