Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen Plus
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen Plus in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 37.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1328 |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1303 |
Long Context Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen Plus?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen Plus share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.