Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 47.3 to 38.1.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 3.1 32b Think
ProviderAmazonAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index41.937.9
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked915

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Coding13701291

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts13561272

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Math—1305

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Expert—1295

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Non-English13401209
LMArena Chinese13411242
LMArena French—1260
LMArena German—1262
LMArena Russian—1193
LMArena Spanish—1289

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following13151247

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query13331272

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Text13641272
LMArena Creative Writing13071226
LMArena Multi-Turn13551252

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper