Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Magistral Small
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 27.3 to 6.8.
- Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Magistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 30.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | — |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.19 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Magistral Small?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Magistral Small better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Magistral Small share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.