Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 47.3 to 41.1.
  • Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
ProviderAmazonNVIDIA
Noometry Index41.940.1
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked910

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 37.9 (#186)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Coding13701296

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 26.2 (#135)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Hard Prompts13561311

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 41.1 (#211)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Non-English13401253
LMArena Chinese13411277
LMArena Russian—1269

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 68.3 (#189)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Instruction Following13151293

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 39.5 (#176)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Longer Query13331299

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 50.8 (#179)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Text13641308
LMArena Creative Writing13071288
LMArena Multi-Turn13551315

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper