Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Llama 3.2 1B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 1B Meta

20.1

Rank #354 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.2 1B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 54.7 to 21.3.
  • Llama 3.2 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Llama 3.2 1B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 1B
ProviderAmazonMeta
Noometry Index41.920.1
Released—2024-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—60K
Max output—54K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.027
Output $ / M tokens—$0.20
Results tracked922

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 1B
LMArena Coding13701070
BigCodeBench Instruct—8.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—11.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 1B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—10.8%
BALROG—6.6%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 1B
LMArena Hard Prompts13561044
Chess Puzzles—0%
Epoch Capabilities Index—101.99

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 1B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—0.6%
LMArena Math—1086

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 1B
GPQA Diamond—23.9%
LMArena Expert—1007

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 1B
LMArena Non-English1340973
LMArena Chinese1341959
LMArena German—1014
LMArena Russian—941

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 1B
LMArena Instruction Following13151031

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 1B
LMArena Longer Query13331050

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 1B
LMArena Text13641055
LMArena Creative Writing13071033
LMArena Multi-Turn13551030
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—200

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Llama 3.2 1B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Llama 3.2 1B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Llama 3.2 1B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 1B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper