Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Llama 3.1-405B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.1-405B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 54.7 to 38.9.
- Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.1-405B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 30.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-07-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1291 |
| WeirdML | — | 21.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 7.4% |
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1269 |
| SimpleBench | — | 23% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 45% |
| DTBench | — | 61.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 82.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.75 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.9 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89.2% |
| PIQA | — | 85.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 89.2% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 9.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 24.9% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1281 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 49.8% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 50.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 17.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1243 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 95.3% |
| MMLU | — | 84.5% |
| TriviaQA | — | 82.7% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1248 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1279 |
| LMArena German | — | 1252 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1208 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1184 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1260 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1259 |
| IFEval | — | 81.1% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1266 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1284 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1297 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 870 |
| WildBench | — | 78.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Llama 3.1-405B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Llama 3.1-405B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Llama 3.1-405B share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-405B has 42.