Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Granite 4.0 H Small
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 54.7 to 43.8.
- Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 36.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1249 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1240 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1247 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1251 |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1222 |
| IFEval | — | 89% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1242 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1211 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1242 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.