Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs GPT-5.1-Codex

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.1-Codex OpenAI

38.6

Rank #186 Reported

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GPT-5.1-Codex specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GPT-5.1-Codex
ProviderAmazonOpenAI
Noometry Index41.938.6
Released—2025-11-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked96

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.1-Codex leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.9 (#116)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GPT-5.1-Codex
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—66%
LMArena WebDev—1337
LMArena Coding1370—
ALE-Bench—1,245

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GPT-5.1-Codex: 38.0 (#33)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GPT-5.1-Codex
Terminal-Bench—60.4%
METR Time Horizons—70.8%

Reasoning Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Hard Prompts1356—

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GPT-5.1-Codex: 30.3 (#235)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GPT-5.1-Codex
ProofBench—9%

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Non-English1340—
LMArena Chinese1341—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Instruction Following1315—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Longer Query1333—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Text1364—
LMArena Creative Writing1307—
LMArena Multi-Turn1355—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than GPT-5.1-Codex?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or GPT-5.1-Codex better for coding?

GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GPT-5.1-Codex share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.1-Codex has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper