Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs GLM-5.1

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.8

Rank #59 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.1 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.1 leads 66.9 to 54.7.
  • GLM-5.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GLM-5.1 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.1
ProviderAmazonZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index41.947.8
Released—2026-04-07
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked941

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.1
LMArena Coding13701485
SWE-bench Verified—74.2%
LMArena WebDev—1508
SciCode—43.8%
WeirdML—57.1%
ALE-Bench—887.1

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.1
APEX-Agents—40.9%
ExploitBench—18.1%
GBAEval—0%
Vending-Bench 2—5,634

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.1
LMArena Hard Prompts13561472
SimpleBench—55.1%
NYT Connections (extended)—77.7%
CritPt—4.6%
Chess Puzzles—19%
Thematic Generalization—69.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.84

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.1
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—36.8%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—67.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
ProofBench—22.2%
LMArena Math—1473
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—33.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—12.5%

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.1
GPQA Diamond—89.9%
SimpleQA Verified—34%
LMArena Expert—1476

Multilingual GLM-5.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.1
LMArena Non-English13401447
LMArena Chinese13411515
LMArena French—1474
LMArena German—1465
LMArena Japanese—1434
LMArena Korean—1418
LMArena Russian—1454
LMArena Spanish—1469

Instruction Following GLM-5.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.1
LMArena Instruction Following13151451

Long Context GLM-5.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.1
LMArena Longer Query13331466

Writing & Preference GLM-5.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.1
LMArena Text13641461
LMArena Creative Writing13071453
LMArena Multi-Turn13551472
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1592

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or GLM-5.1 better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GLM-5.1 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.1 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper