Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 4 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 27.3 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 35.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1350 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 13.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 38.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 25.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 59.9% |
| CadEval | — | 30% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 11.4% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1346 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 1.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 31.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.8% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 1.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 78.2% |
| DTBench | — | 63.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 69.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.36 |
| LiveBench | — | 66.9% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 57.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 75.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1352 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 82.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 64.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 6.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 55.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1339 |
| MMLU | — | 79.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1158 |
| GeoBench | — | 77% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1342 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | — | 1391 |
| LMArena German | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1294 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1363 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1336 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 85.8% |
| IFEval | — | 84.1% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1344 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 61.1% |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1354 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1340 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1350 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1128 |
| WildBench | — | 80% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.
Related comparisons
- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Magistral Medium
- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs C4ai Aya Expanse 8b
- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs GPT-5.4 nano
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Qwen3.5 27B
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs GLM-4.7