Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs ERNIE 5.1
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 1 category and ERNIE 5.1 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 54.7.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | ERNIE 5.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 43.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1488 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, ERNIE 5.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1227 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1481 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 23.4% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1481 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1492 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1454 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1508 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1473 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1460 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1462 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1468 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1441 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1471 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than ERNIE 5.1?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and ERNIE 5.1 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.1 has 19.