Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs DeepSeek-V3.1

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and DeepSeek-V3.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.4 vs 42.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1 DeepSeek

42.2

Rank #106 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 1 category and DeepSeek-V3.1 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.1 leads 60.5 to 55.0.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and DeepSeek-V3.1 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09DeepSeek-V3.1
ProviderAmazonDeepSeek
Noometry Index41.442.2
Released—2025-08-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—164K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.95
Results tracked927

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142), DeepSeek-V3.1: 39.8 (#140)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09DeepSeek-V3.1
LMArena Coding13711417
WeirdML—38.4%

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122), DeepSeek-V3.1: 27.3 (#109)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09DeepSeek-V3.1
LMArena Hard Prompts13561417
SimpleBench—40%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—53.2%
DTBench—82.7%
LMCA—24.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.92
ForecastBench—58

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, DeepSeek-V3.1: 36.1 (#125)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09DeepSeek-V3.1
LMArena Math—1420

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, DeepSeek-V3.1: 43.0 (#86)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09DeepSeek-V3.1
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.5%
LMArena Expert—1403

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145), DeepSeek-V3.1: 51.8 (#100)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09DeepSeek-V3.1
LMArena Non-English13411400
LMArena Chinese13451470
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1412
LMArena Japanese—1374
LMArena Korean—1337
LMArena Russian—1405
LMArena Spanish—1429

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167), DeepSeek-V3.1: 74.1 (#105)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09DeepSeek-V3.1
LMArena Instruction Following13161400

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146), DeepSeek-V3.1: 36.3 (#227)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09DeepSeek-V3.1
LMArena Longer Query13341422
Fiction.LiveBench—52.8%

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144), DeepSeek-V3.1: 60.5 (#93)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09DeepSeek-V3.1
LMArena Text13651420
LMArena Creative Writing13071401
LMArena Multi-Turn13541408
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1436

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than DeepSeek-V3.1?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and DeepSeek-V3.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.4 vs 42.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or DeepSeek-V3.1 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (39.6 vs 39.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and DeepSeek-V3.1 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-V3.1 has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper