Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Codellama 70b Instruct

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 5 categories and Codellama 70b Instruct in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 47.3 to 24.8.
  • Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Codellama 70b Instruct specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Codellama 70b Instruct
ProviderAmazonMeta
Noometry Index41.933.7
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked97

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Codellama 70b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.7%
LMArena Coding1370—
BigCodeBench Complete—49.6%
HumanEval+—65.9%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Codellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13561052

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Codellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1340992
LMArena Chinese1341—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Codellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13151024

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Codellama 70b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Codellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1333—

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Codellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Text13641057
LMArena Creative Writing1307—
LMArena Multi-Turn1355—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Codellama 70b Instruct?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Codellama 70b Instruct better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Codellama 70b Instruct share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Codellama 70b Instruct has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper