Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 49.2 to 40.2.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 49.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-10-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1587 |
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | — |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 65.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 30% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 75.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.9% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 89.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 23.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 47.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Claude Haiku 5.5: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Claude Haiku 5.5: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Claude Haiku 5.5: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Claude Haiku 5.5: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Claude Haiku 5.5?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Claude Haiku 5.5 better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Claude Haiku 5.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9.