Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Claude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.3 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Fable 5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Fable 5 leads 76.8 to 26.2.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Fable 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 66.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-06-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $50 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 61 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Fable 5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142), Claude Fable 5: 67.0 (#4)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Fable 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1371 | 1519 |
| DeepSWE | — | 69.9% |
| FrontierCode | — | 53.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1626 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 47% |
| SciCode | — | 61% |
| WeirdML | — | 91.9% |
| MirrorCode | — | 63.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 2,041 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Claude Fable 5: 54.1 (#2)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Fable 5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 63.6% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 16.1% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 39.7% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 41.8% |
| GBAEval | — | 74.5% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 30% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1230 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,680 |
Reasoning Claude Fable 5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122), Claude Fable 5: 76.8 (#4)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Fable 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1508 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 89.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 81.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 91.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 92.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 98.5% |
| CritPt | — | 28.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 41% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 39.3% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 39.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 52% |
| DTBench | — | 98.4% |
| LMCA | — | 61.1% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 95% |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.13 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 163.6 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Claude Fable 5: 88.4 (#5)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Fable 5 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 87% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 90.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 100% |
| ProofBench | — | 95% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1519 |
| FrontierMath Erdős | — | 0% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Claude Fable 5: 62.3 (#22)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Fable 5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 70.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1534 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Claude Fable 5: 45.6 (#14)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Fable 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1326 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 38.6% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 35.8% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1496 |
Multilingual Claude Fable 5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145), Claude Fable 5: 57.6 (#8)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Fable 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1341 | 1483 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1345 | 1546 |
| LMArena French | — | 1509 |
| LMArena German | — | 1486 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1493 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1507 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1503 |
Instruction Following Claude Fable 5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167), Claude Fable 5: 78.8 (#7)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Fable 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1316 | 1503 |
Long Context Claude Fable 5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146), Claude Fable 5: 46.3 (#22)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Fable 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1510 |
Writing & Preference Claude Fable 5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144), Claude Fable 5: 76.1 (#5)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude Fable 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1365 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1494 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1505 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1943 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1340 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Claude Fable 5?
Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.3 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Claude Fable 5 better for coding?
Claude Fable 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.0 versus 39.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Claude Fable 5 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Claude Fable 5 has 61.