Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Claude 3.5 Sonnet in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 27.3 to 23.1.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 34.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-06-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 60 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1342 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 51.6% |
| GSO | — | 4.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 40% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 46.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 67.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58.6% |
| CadEval | — | 48% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 81.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 74.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 24% |
| Cybench | — | 17.5% |
| BALROG | — | 32.6% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 45.2% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1305 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.4% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.9% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 56.7% |
| DTBench | — | 67.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.55 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.7 |
| LiveBench | — | 59% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 27.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 52.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1307 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 2.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 55.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 4.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 77.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 19.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 56.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1265 |
| MMLU | — | 87.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1125 |
| Video-MME | — | 60% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| VPCT | — | 33% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1283 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1272 |
| LMArena French | — | 1305 |
| LMArena German | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1200 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 69.3% |
| IFEval | — | 85.5% |
Long Context Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1311 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1298 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1292 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1326 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.3% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1451 |
| WildBench | — | 79.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 53.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Claude 3.5 Sonnet?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Claude 3.5 Sonnet better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60.