Model comparison

Aion 3.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); Aion 3.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Aion 3.5 AionLabs

58.1

Unranked Sparse

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.2

Rank #32 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Aion 3.5 leads 74.9 to 65.5.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $1.50 / $9 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $6 for Aion 3.5.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

Aion 3.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash specifications
Aion 3.5Gemini 3.5 Flash
ProviderAionLabsGoogle
Noometry Index58.154.2
Released—2026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window262K1.05M
Max output33K66K
Input $ / M tokens$3$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$6$9
Results tracked154

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Gemini 3.5 Flash
SWE-bench Verified—79.3%
DeepSWE—37.4%
LMArena WebDev—1499
SciCode—53.1%
WeirdML—62.6%
LMArena Coding—1492
ALE-Bench—911.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Gemini 3.5 Flash
APEX-Agents—27.5%
GBAEval—6.7%
GDP.pdf—14%
Vending-Bench 2—5,396

Reasoning Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Gemini 3.5 Flash
ARC-AGI-2—72.1%
SimpleBench—76.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—92.6%
ARC-AGI-1—92.5%
CritPt—13.1%
Chess Puzzles—50%
EnigmaEval—25.4%
EBR-Bench—4.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1488
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—47.1%
Surface Evolver Bench—58.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.46
ForecastBench—59

Math Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36)

Knowledge Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Gemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond—92.8%
SimpleQA Verified—66.2%
LMArena Expert—1495

Multimodal Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision—1310
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.6%
LMArena Document—1463

Multilingual Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1476
LMArena Chinese—1526
LMArena French—1490
LMArena German—1492
LMArena Japanese—1486
LMArena Korean—1451
LMArena Russian—1493
LMArena Spanish—1480

Instruction Following Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1467

Long Context Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1482

Writing & Preference Aion 3.5 leads

Aion 3.5: 74.9, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text—1482
LMArena Creative Writing—1470
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1929—
EQ-Bench 4—1087
LMArena Multi-Turn—1481

Frequently asked questions

Is Aion 3.5 better than Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); Aion 3.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Aion 3.5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $1.50 per million input tokens and $9 per million output tokens; Aion 3.5 lists at $3 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Aion 3.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Aion 3.5 has 1 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54.

Related comparisons

Go deeper