Model comparison

Aion 3.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#40); Aion 3.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Aion 3.5 AionLabs

57.9

Unranked Sparse

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

50.3

Rank #40 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Aion 3.5 scores higher in 1 category and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Aion 3.5 leads 74.9 to 65.8.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $6 for Aion 3.5.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Aion 3.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash specifications
Aion 3.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ProviderAionLabsDeepSeek
Noometry Index57.950.3
Released—2026-09-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K1M
Max output33K393K
Input $ / M tokens$3$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$6$0.60
Results tracked125

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev—1620
SciCode—51.9%
LMArena Coding—1511
ALE-Bench—1,092

Reasoning Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
CritPt—14.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1485
DTBench—89.9%
LMCA—47%
Surface Evolver Bench—46.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.01

Math Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ProofBench—54%
LMArena Math—1493

Knowledge Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Expert—1505

Multilingual Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1452
LMArena Chinese—1506
LMArena French—1448
LMArena Russian—1473
LMArena Spanish—1499

Instruction Following Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1475

Long Context Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1476

Writing & Preference Aion 3.5 leads

Aion 3.5: 74.9, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
EQ-Bench Creative Writing19291540
LMArena Text—1465
LMArena Creative Writing—1436
LMArena Multi-Turn—1460

Frequently asked questions

Is Aion 3.5 better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#40); Aion 3.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Aion 3.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Aion 3.5 lists at $3 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Aion 3.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Aion 3.5 has 1 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper