Noometry

Model comparison

AI Co-Mathematician vs GLM-5.2

GLM-5.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); AI Co-Mathematician does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

AI Co-Mathematician Google

58.1

Unranked Sparse

GLM-5.2 Z.ai (Zhipu)

51.1

Rank #44 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. AI Co-Mathematician scores higher in 1 category and GLM-5.2 in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where AI Co-Mathematician leads 72.3 to 55.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 75.6% for AI Co-Mathematician and 29.3% for GLM-5.2.
  • GLM-5.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

AI Co-MathematicianGLM-5.2
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index58.151.1
Released2026-05-082026-06-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked251

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, GLM-5.2: 51.3 (#41)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGLM-5.2
SWE-bench Verified—78.7%
DeepSWE—43.8%
FrontierCode—24.5%
LMArena WebDev—1603
SciCode—50.5%
WeirdML—70.1%
LMArena Coding—1485
ALE-Bench—1,047

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, GLM-5.2: 32.4 (#63)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGLM-5.2
APEX-Agents—45.2%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—31.7%
GBAEval—0%
Vending-Bench 2—8,314

Reasoning Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, GLM-5.2: 42.3 (#52)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGLM-5.2
ARC-AGI-2—22.8%
SimpleBench—58.8%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.6%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.3%
ARC-AGI-1—77%
CritPt—20.9%
Chess Puzzles—21%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1480
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—93.6%
LMCA—45.8%
Surface Evolver Bench—55.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—151.78

Math AI Co-Mathematician leads

AI Co-Mathematician: 72.3, GLM-5.2: 55.7 (#43)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGLM-5.2
FrontierMath Tier 475.6%29.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—59.2%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—67.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.4%
ProofBench—35%
LMArena Math—1482
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)47.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, GLM-5.2: 57.1 (#40)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGLM-5.2
GPQA Diamond—91.9%
SimpleQA Verified—34.2%
LMArena Expert—1486

Multilingual Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, GLM-5.2: 55.8 (#26)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGLM-5.2
LMArena Non-English—1459
LMArena Chinese—1519
LMArena French—1479
LMArena German—1468
LMArena Japanese—1451
LMArena Korean—1445
LMArena Russian—1466
LMArena Spanish—1477

Instruction Following Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, GLM-5.2: 76.9 (#34)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGLM-5.2
LMArena Instruction Following—1465

Long Context Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, GLM-5.2: 45.3 (#43)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGLM-5.2
LMArena Longer Query—1479

Writing & Preference Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, GLM-5.2: 70.4 (#21)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGLM-5.2
LMArena Text—1470
LMArena Creative Writing—1462
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1757
EQ-Bench 4—1222
LMArena Multi-Turn—1469

Frequently asked questions

Is AI Co-Mathematician better than GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); AI Co-Mathematician does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do AI Co-Mathematician and GLM-5.2 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. AI Co-Mathematician has 2 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.2 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper