Noometry

Model comparison

AI Co-Mathematician vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); AI Co-Mathematician does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

AI Co-Mathematician Google

58.1

Unranked Sparse

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.2

Rank #32 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. AI Co-Mathematician scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 3.5 Flash in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where AI Co-Mathematician leads 72.3 to 60.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 75.6% for AI Co-Mathematician and 26.8% for Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Side by side

AI Co-MathematicianGemini 3.5 Flash
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index58.154.2
Released2026-05-082026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$9
Results tracked254

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGemini 3.5 Flash
SWE-bench Verified—79.3%
DeepSWE—37.4%
LMArena WebDev—1499
SciCode—53.1%
WeirdML—62.6%
LMArena Coding—1492
ALE-Bench—911.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGemini 3.5 Flash
APEX-Agents—27.5%
GBAEval—6.7%
GDP.pdf—14%
Vending-Bench 2—5,396

Reasoning Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGemini 3.5 Flash
ARC-AGI-2—72.1%
SimpleBench—76.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—92.6%
ARC-AGI-1—92.5%
CritPt—13.1%
Chess Puzzles—50%
EnigmaEval—25.4%
EBR-Bench—4.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1488
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—47.1%
Surface Evolver Bench—58.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.46
ForecastBench—59

Math AI Co-Mathematician leads

AI Co-Mathematician: 72.3, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGemini 3.5 Flash
FrontierMath Tier 475.6%26.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)47.9%14.6%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—62.8%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—76.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—31%
LMArena Math—1504
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%

Knowledge Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond—92.8%
SimpleQA Verified—66.2%
LMArena Expert—1495

Multimodal Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision—1310
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.6%
LMArena Document—1463

Multilingual Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1476
LMArena Chinese—1526
LMArena French—1490
LMArena German—1492
LMArena Japanese—1486
LMArena Korean—1451
LMArena Russian—1493
LMArena Spanish—1480

Instruction Following Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1467

Long Context Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1482

Writing & Preference Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text—1482
LMArena Creative Writing—1470
EQ-Bench 4—1087
LMArena Multi-Turn—1481

Frequently asked questions

Is AI Co-Mathematician better than Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); AI Co-Mathematician does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do AI Co-Mathematician and Gemini 3.5 Flash share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. AI Co-Mathematician has 2 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54.

Related comparisons

Go deeper