Model comparison

AI Co-Mathematician vs Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#3); AI Co-Mathematician does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

AI Co-Mathematician Google

57.6

Unranked Sparse

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

68.5

Rank #3 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. AI Co-Mathematician scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Opus 5.5 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 5.5 leads 92.4 to 71.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 75.6% for AI Co-Mathematician and 95% for Claude Opus 5.5.

Side by side

AI Co-Mathematician and Claude Opus 5.5 specifications
AI Co-MathematicianClaude Opus 5.5
ProviderGoogleAnthropic
Noometry Index57.668.5
Released2026-05-082026-09-22
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$4
Output $ / M tokens—$20
Results tracked235

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 71.4 (#1)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Opus 5.5
FrontierCode—54.4%
CursorBench—57.8%
LMArena WebDev—1820
FrontierSWE—62.3%
SciCode—66.9%
LMArena Coding—1545
MirrorCode—77.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 45.3 (#13)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Opus 5.5
APEX-Agents—73.5%
GDP.pdf—30.6%

Reasoning Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 79.5 (#2)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Opus 5.5
ARC-AGI-2—92.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—88.5%
ARC-AGI-1—97.5%
CritPt—31.7%
EBR-Bench—71.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1545
Mystery Game Puzzles—71%
DTBench—98.9%
LMCA—68.2%

Math Claude Opus 5.5 leads

AI Co-Mathematician: 71.7, Claude Opus 5.5: 92.4 (#2)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Opus 5.5
FrontierMath Tier 475.6%95%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—91.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—100%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)47.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 66.6 (#9)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Opus 5.5
GPQA Diamond—90.6%
SimpleQA Verified—72.2%
LMArena Expert—1564

Multimodal Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 56.5 (#2)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Opus 5.5
Furniture Assembly—83.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 59.8 (#1)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Opus 5.5
LMArena Non-English—1513
LMArena Chinese—1572
LMArena Russian—1532

Instruction Following Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 80.1 (#2)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Opus 5.5
LMArena Instruction Following—1535

Long Context Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 47.3 (#18)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Opus 5.5
LMArena Longer Query—1540

Writing & Preference Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Opus 5.5: 78.7 (#3)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text—1518
LMArena Creative Writing—1538
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2050
LMArena Multi-Turn—1520

Frequently asked questions

Is AI Co-Mathematician better than Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#3); AI Co-Mathematician does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do AI Co-Mathematician and Claude Opus 5.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. AI Co-Mathematician has 2 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 5.5 has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper